Case 1404014/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss N Atkins v Swindon Domestic Cleaning Services Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 1404014/2023
- Decision date
- 5 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Self Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss N Atkins
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Self recorded that the Respondent stated it did not intend to defend the claim. On that basis, the tribunal held that Miss N Atkins's claim for a redundancy payment was well-founded and succeeded. The Respondent was ordered to pay £4,590 in respect of that claim.
The tribunal also held that the claim for wrongful dismissal was well-founded and succeeded. The Respondent was ordered to pay £2,640 in respect of that claim. The written record does not set out further reasons, and the total sum payable under the judgment was £7,230.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The Respondent stated that it did not intend to defend the claim. The judgment records the redundancy payment claim as well-founded and successful, but gives no further reasons. | Upheld | — | £4,590 |
| Wrongful dismissal | The Respondent stated that it did not intend to defend the claim. The judgment records the wrongful dismissal claim as well-founded and successful, but gives no further reasons. | Upheld | — | £2,640 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,230
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.