Case 1404035/2023 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v UNBXD Studios Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 1404035/2023
- Decision date
- 16 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the remote CVP hearing on 26 June 2024 before Employment Judge N J Roper, Mr Marcin Michalski succeeded in his unfair dismissal claim against Unbxd Studios Limited (in creditors voluntary liquidation). The tribunal ordered compensation limited to the basic award of £2,365.36, calculated as 4 weeks' pay at £591.34.
The claimant also succeeded in his unlawful deduction from wages claim. The tribunal ordered payment of £1,892.21 gross, made up of ten unpaid monthly employee pension contributions of £1,182.60 and ten unpaid monthly employer pension contributions of £709.61. To the extent there were any remaining claims, the tribunal recorded that they were dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Compensation was limited to the basic award of £2,365.36, calculated as 4 weeks' pay at £591.34. | Upheld | — | £2,365 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The award was a gross sum of £1,892.21, comprising ten unpaid monthly employee pension contributions of £1,182.60 and ten unpaid monthly employer pension contributions of £709.61. | Upheld | — | £1,892 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,258
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £2,365
- statutory, unfair dismissal
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.