Mrs S Dawe v Pretty 1098 Limited — 2022

Case reference: 1404036/2021
Decision date: 8 November 2022
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Midgley Date

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mrs S Dawe

Respondent

Pretty 1098 Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The Tribunal struck out the claim. In reasons dated 1 November 2022, Employment Judge Midgley recorded that by letter dated 12 October 2022 the claimant had been given an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out.

The stated bases for strike out were that the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 17 March 2022 to attend the hearing listed for 29 September 2022, and that the claim had not been actively pursued. The judgment states that the hearing fixed for 5 to 7 June 2023 would not take place.

No merits findings or financial remedy were recorded in the judgment text supplied.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	The judgment does not identify the underlying causes of action in the text provided; it records only that 'the claim is struck out' because the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 17 March 2022 to attend the hearing and because the claim had not been actively pursued.	Struck out	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.