Case 1404043/2018 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 1404043/2018
- Decision date
- 5 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Panel members
- Ms R Hewitt-Gray, Mr I Ley
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sat at Exeter on 4 and 5 November 2019 before Employment Judge N J Roper, with Ms R Hewitt-Gray and Mr I Ley as members. The judgment records Mr Robert Crawford as claimant and The Abbeyfield Southwest Society as respondent, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by Mr M Green of Counsel.
By consent, the tribunal recorded that the claimant’s claims were dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. The judgment does not set out any substantive findings on liability, does not allocate any separate outcome to individual claims, and does not record any remedy award.
The judgment also records that there was no application and no order for costs.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claimant’s claims were dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant, but does not separate the disposition by claim. This claim type is inferred from the gov.uk listing category. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | The judgment states that the claimant’s claims were dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant, but does not separate the disposition by claim. This claim type is inferred from the gov.uk listing category. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.