Case 1404043/2023 · Employment Tribunal
In person (assisted by her mother Mrs Dyson) For the v Mr Wiltshire (a partner of the Respondent) — 2023
- Case reference
- 1404043/2023
- Decision date
- 8 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gray Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person (assisted by her mother Mrs Dyson) For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Southampton by video on 17 November 2023 before Employment Judge Gray, recorded that the Claimant, Miss M Dyson, appeared in person with assistance from her mother, Mrs Dyson, and the Respondent was represented by Mr Wiltshire, a partner of the Respondent. The judgment was given orally at the hearing and later sent to the parties on 8 December 2023.
By consent, the Claimant succeeded in her claim for unauthorised deductions from wages. The tribunal ordered the Respondent, Arlington House (a partnership), to pay the Claimant the gross sum of £60. No further findings, legal analysis, or separate heads of loss were set out in the written record.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | By consent, the Claimant succeeded in her claim for unauthorised deductions from wages and the Respondent was ordered to pay the gross sum of £60. | Upheld | — | £60 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £60
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.