Case 1404044/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr LS Davies v Longmans Cheese Sales Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 1404044/2018
- Decision date
- 3 May 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey Representation
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr LS Davies
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Bristol on 3 May 2019 before Employment Judge Livesey. The respondent did not attend. The tribunal proceeded under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 and determined the claim on the available material.
The tribunal found that Longmans Cheese Sales Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr LS Davies's wages and ordered it to pay him £6.34 gross. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £274.05. The judgment does not record any additional findings or separate remedy elements beyond those two sums.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £6.34. | Upheld | — | £6 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £274.05. | Upheld | — | £274 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £280
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.