Case 1404044/2023 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Baked In Ltd (in Administration) and Secretary of State for Business and Trade — 2024
- Case reference
- 1404044/2023
- Decision date
- 6 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rayner Appearances
- Venue
- Southampton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Baked In Ltd (in administration) proposed to make 20 or more employees at one establishment redundant within a period of 90 days or less. It further found that the First Respondent failed to consult Mr Jack Allen about the dismissals and failed to facilitate the election of an appropriate representative, there being no recognised trade union at the workplace.
On that basis, the tribunal held that the claimant was entitled to a protective award for a period of 90 days. The protected period was stated to run from 10 May 2023 to 28 August 2023.
The award was not quantified in the judgment. The reasons were given orally at the hearing, and the written record states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Protective award under the collective redundancy consultation provisions. The tribunal found the First Respondent proposed to make 20 or more employees at one establishment redundant within 90 days or less and failed to consult the claimant and to facilitate the election of appropriate employee representatives. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.