Case 1404052/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Dixon v React & Refurb Group Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1404052/2022
- Decision date
- 7 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge J Bax Representation
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J Dixon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing took place by video on 22 August 2023 before Employment Judge J Bax. The Respondent did not attend. The tribunal found that Mrs J Dixon's claim for unlawful deductions from wages, in relation to pension contributions, was well founded and ordered the Respondent to pay £431.42 gross.
The tribunal also found the claim for accrued but untaken holiday pay to be well founded and ordered payment of £2,422.98 gross. In addition, it held that Mrs J Dixon had been unfairly dismissed by the Respondent.
For the unfair dismissal claim, the tribunal awarded a basic award of £1,713 and a compensatory award of £8,564.47 net, described as loss of earnings only. The total sum payable was recorded as £13,131.87. The tribunal further stated that the Employment Protection (Recoupment of Jobseeker's Allowance and Income Support) Regulations 1996 did not apply.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The unlawful deduction finding related to the Claimant's pension contributions; the tribunal ordered payment of £431.42 gross. | Upheld | — | £431 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the claim for accrued but untaken holiday pay well founded and ordered payment of £2,422.98 gross. | Upheld | — | £2,423 |
| Unfair dismissal | The Claimant was found to have been unfairly dismissed. The tribunal awarded a basic award of £1,713 and a compensatory award of £8,564.47 net, comprising loss of earnings only. | Upheld | — | £10,277 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £13,132
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,713
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £8,564
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.