Case 1404054/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L Rogers v Wessex College — 2020
- Case reference
- 1404054/2019
- Decision date
- 24 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Roper Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss L Rogers
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a strike-out judgment under rule 37. The tribunal recorded that, by letter dated 14 February 2020, the claimant was given an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for non-compliance with the tribunal's order dated 31 January 2020 and because the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim.
The hearing fixed for 13 March 2020 was vacated and would not take place. No monetary remedy was awarded or recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37 because the claimant had not complied with the order dated 31 January 2020 and the claim had not been actively pursued. By letter dated 14 February 2020, the claimant was given an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing, but did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.