Case 1404073/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Antunes v Carter Wilson Recruitment — 2021
- Case reference
- 1404073/2020
- Decision date
- 2 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dawson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A Antunes
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was dealt with under Rule 21 because no response had been presented by the Respondent, and the Employment Judge decided the case on the information before the tribunal. The judgment records that the Respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the Claimant's wages and orders payment of £911.00 for that claim.
The tribunal also found that the Respondent had failed to pay the Claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £756.00 in respect of that claim. The judgment does not set out any further findings, dispute about liability, or separate remedy components beyond those two sums.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Default judgment under Rule 21; the tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £911.00. | Upheld | — | £911 |
| Holiday pay | Default judgment under Rule 21; the tribunal found unpaid holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £756.00. | Upheld | — | £756 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,667
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.