Case 1404095/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr I Moulton v Farm Solutions Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1404095/2019
- Decision date
- 11 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr I Moulton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis reserved judgment at Manchester on 30 November 2020 determined only the preliminary issue of status. Mr I Moulton, who appeared in person, had been engaged as a Regional Manager from March 2015 until the consultancy was terminated on four weeks' notice on 26 June 2019. The Tribunal held that he was a limb (b) worker under regulation 2 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 and section 230(3)(b) of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The Tribunal accepted that the written Consultancy Agreement described the relationship as one of independent contractor and permitted substitution only with the respondent's prior written approval. It also noted the provisions allowing administrative help and other work subject to restrictions. However, it found that the right of substitution was limited and only likely to be used for emergency cover, that Ms Welch was administrative support rather than a substitute, and that parts of the work had to be done personally, including Tuesday Skype calls and duties affected by Gangmasters Licence requirements.
Looking at the relationship as a whole, the Tribunal concluded that Farm Solutions Ltd was not a client or customer of any profession or business carried on by the claimant. It relied on the way the claimant was invoiced, the supervision and control exercised, the presentation of the claimant to clients, and the conclusion that the relationship did not change over time. The judgment did not determine the holiday pay, Regulation 14 Working Time Regulations, or unlawful deduction from wages issues; those matters were left for a final hearing.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The claimant said he was entitled to 42 days' holiday pay worth £4,200. The hearing determined worker status only and left holiday entitlement and payment in lieu to the final hearing. | Other | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Any unlawful deduction from wages issue was not determined at this hearing. The Tribunal said it would need to decide at a final hearing whether any deduction was made, and if so when and how much. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- section 230(3)(b) Employment Rights Act 1996
- regulation 2 Working Time Regulations 1998
- Ready-Mix Concrete
- Pimlico Plumbers v Smith
- client or customer test
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.