Case 1404096/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Edwards, Consultant For the v Flying Monkey Bars Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1404096/2020
- Decision date
- 17 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Edwards, Consultant For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard by Employment Judge N J Roper on 5 February 2021 by cloud video platform. The respondent did not attend. The claimant, Mr Dean Winchester, was represented by Mr G Edwards, Consultant.
The tribunal found that the claimant was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment of £2,100.00. The judgment records that this was calculated on the basis of six weeks' service at age 39, using a gross weekly pay figure of £350.00.
The tribunal also upheld the claimant's unlawful deduction from wages claim in respect of five days' guarantee pay. It ordered the respondent to pay £150.00 gross, calculated at £30.00 per day.
A further claim for accrued but unpaid holiday pay succeeded. The tribunal ordered payment of £980.00 gross, assessed as 2.8 weeks' pay at £350.00 per week. The total amount awarded by the judgment was £3,230.00 gross.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Tribunal found the claimant was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment of £2,100.00, calculated as six weeks' service at age 39 at £350.00 gross per week. | Upheld | — | £2,100 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim succeeded for five days' guarantee pay at £30.00 per day, totalling £150.00 gross. | Upheld | — | £150 |
| Holiday pay | The claim succeeded for accrued but unpaid holiday pay assessed at 2.8 weeks' pay at £350.00 per week, totalling £980.00 gross. | Upheld | — | £980 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,230
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.