Case 1404102/2022 · Employment Tribunal
- MS L MANKAU (COUNSEL) FOR THE v - Ms J Cornwell — 2023
- Case reference
- 1404102/2022
- Decision date
- 4 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
- MS L MANKAU (COUNSEL) FOR THE
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment of 19 June 2023 records that the parties had reached agreement and that judgment was entered by consent. The tribunal therefore upheld the claimant's claims for unpaid notice pay, unpaid wages, accrued but unpaid holiday pay, redundancy pay, and unfair dismissal. The judgment does not set out substantive liability findings beyond the parties' agreement.
The respondent was ordered to pay £2,238.48 gross for unpaid notice pay, £6,456.75 gross for unpaid wages, £358.14 gross for accrued but unpaid holiday pay, and £1,119.24 for redundancy pay. On the unfair dismissal claim, the compensatory award was made up of £705.42 for loss of earnings and £500 for loss of statutory rights, giving £1,205.42 on that head. The total monetary award recorded in the judgment was £11,378.03.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Unpaid notice pay; the judgment upheld this by consent and ordered payment of £2,238.48 gross. | Upheld | — | £2,238 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Judgment described this as breach of contract / unlawful deduction from wages for unpaid wages; upheld by consent. | Upheld | — | £6,457 |
| Holiday pay | Judgment described this as breach of contract / unlawful deduction from wages for accrued but unpaid holiday pay; upheld by consent. | Upheld | — | £358 |
| Redundancy | Redundancy pay was upheld by consent. | Upheld | — | £1,119 |
| Unfair dismissal | Compensatory award comprised £705.42 for loss of earnings and £500 for loss of statutory rights. | Upheld | — | £1,205 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £11,378
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £1,205
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.