Case 1404127/2021 · Employment Tribunal
In person v Respondent — 2022
- Case reference
- 1404127/2021
- Decision date
- 16 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Smail Appearances
- Venue
- Exeter
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that the Claimant was not unfairly dismissed. The judgment records that full oral reasons were given at the hearing, but the extracted text does not include those reasons, so the dismissal outcome is recorded only as stated in the formal judgment.
The tribunal also ordered the Respondent to pay the Claimant contractual sick pay provisionally assessed at £6,316.72 and accrued but untaken holiday pay provisionally assessed at £249.97. The total ordered was £6,566.69, payable within 21 days unless the Respondent challenged the calculations within 14 days by email to the Tribunal and the Claimant.
If the Respondent challenged the figures, the judgment directed the Claimant to respond within a further 14 days, after which the matter was to be placed before Employment Judge Smail for determination on the papers.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Tribunal ordered payment of contractual sick pay, provisionally assessed at £6,316.72. | Upheld | — | £6,317 |
| Working time regulations | Tribunal ordered payment of accrued but untaken holiday pay, provisionally assessed at £249.97. | Upheld | — | £250 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,567
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.