Case 1404134/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms K Ogieglo v First West of England Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1404134/2022
- Decision date
- 14 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cuthbert Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms K Ogieglo
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant worked for First West of England Limited as a bus driver from 23 September 2019 until her dismissal on 12 August 2022. After the assault on 11 July 2021, she relied on anxiety, depression/depressive disorder and panic attacks as mental impairments. The tribunal accepted the claimant’s evidence, together with GP records, an occupational health report and the treating psychologist’s letter, that she experienced sleep disturbance, fear, low mood, breathing difficulties, panic symptoms, reduced appetite, difficulty with household tasks, and difficulty travelling, working and taking part in social and religious activities.
Applying section 6 of the Equality Act 2010 and the Goodwin four-stage approach, the tribunal found that these were underlying and overlapping mental impairments which had a substantial adverse effect on normal day-to-day activities. It accepted that the effects were more than minor or trivial, noting in particular that the claimant was unable to work as a bus driver for much of the period, had difficulty with shopping, cooking, cleaning and laundry, and struggled with social and religious participation. The tribunal also took account of treatment, including medication and counselling, and found that the beneficial effects of treatment had to be disregarded when assessing substantial adverse effect.
On long-term effect, the tribunal held that the substantial adverse effects had lasted for 12 months by 11 July 2022 and continued to affect the claimant at dismissal on 12 August 2022. It also found that by 4 March 2022 it could well have been the case that the effects would last at least 12 months, given the continuing symptoms, the repeated unsuccessful attempts to return to work, the increase in antidepressant medication and the continuation of therapy. It therefore concluded that the claimant was disabled for Equality Act purposes between 4 March 2022 and 12 August 2022.
The consequence of that finding was that disability discrimination complaints arising during that period could proceed to the final hearing listed for April 2024. Any disability discrimination complaints before 4 March 2022 were dismissed at this stage because the claimant had not yet established disability for the earlier period.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | This was a reserved preliminary-issue judgment on disability only. The tribunal held that the claimant was disabled for Equality Act 2010 purposes between 4 March 2022 and 12 August 2022. Disability discrimination complaints pre-dating 4 March 2022 were dismissed, and complaints arising during the qualifying period were left to be determined at the final hearing in April 2024. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
8 references- s.6 Equality Act 2010
- Goodwin v Patent Office four-stage approach
- Sch 1 para 2 Equality Act 2010
- Sch 1 para 5 Equality Act 2010
- Cruickshank v Vaw Motorcast Ltd
- Sullivan v Bury Street Capital Limited
- J v DLA Piper UK LLP
- SCA Packaging Ltd v Boyle
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.