Case 1404135/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Helen Chapman v Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust — 2023
- Case reference
- 1404135/2022
- Decision date
- 12 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bradford Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Helen Chapman
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard Ms Helen Chapman’s case against Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust at Bristol (virtually) on 28 and 29 June 2023 before Employment Judge Bradford. The written judgment records two claims: constructive dismissal under section 95(1)(c) Employment Rights Act 1996, and unauthorised deductions from wages, including unpaid holiday pay, under Part II Employment Rights Act 1996.
Both claims were dismissed. The short written record does not set out the tribunal’s oral reasons, and it states that written reasons will not be provided unless requested in time. The extracted text therefore records the outcomes only and does not identify any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The written record states that the claim under section 95(1)(c) Employment Rights Act 1996 was dismissed. No oral reasons are included in the extracted text. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The written record states that the claim for unauthorised deductions from wages, including unpaid holiday pay, contrary to Part II Employment Rights Act 1996, was dismissed. No oral reasons are included in the extracted text. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 95(1)(c) Employment Rights Act 1996
- Part II Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.