Case 1404137/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Johnson v Chelmix Concrete Limited Traditional Lime — 2023
- Case reference
- 1404137/2022
- Decision date
- 13 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gray Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Johnson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal considered the claimant’s claim for a redundancy payment under section 155 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. It found that the claimant had been employed by the respondent for less than two years, so he did not have the right to a redundancy payment under that provision.
The claimant was given an opportunity to explain why the redundancy payment claim should not be struck out, but he did not provide an acceptable reason. The tribunal therefore struck out the redundancy payment claim.
The judgment states that the claimant’s other complaints were not affected by this decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Claim struck out because the claimant had been employed for less than two years and gave no acceptable reason, after being given an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out. The tribunal stated that the claimant’s other complaints were not affected by this judgment. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.155 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.