Case 1404143/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Both in person For the v Mr Alan Williams (Solicitor) — 2021
- Case reference
- 1404143/2020
- Decision date
- 15 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gray Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Both in person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that Mrs J Temperton and Mrs N Fewings' complaints of unfair dismissal succeeded and declared that both were unfairly dismissed. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing, so no written reasons were provided unless requested within 14 days.
As to remedy, the parties agreed that the Respondent would pay Mrs Temperton a basic award of £807.70. The parties also agreed that the Respondent would pay Mrs Fewings a basic award of £244.42 and a compensatory award of £370.26. The total of the recorded agreed awards is £1,422.38.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Mrs J Temperton: complaint of unfair dismissal succeeded; the agreed remedy recorded a basic award of £807.70. | Upheld | — | £808 |
| Unfair dismissal | Mrs N Fewings: complaint of unfair dismissal succeeded; the agreed remedy recorded a basic award of £244.42 and a compensatory award of £370.26. | Upheld | — | £615 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,422
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,052
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £370
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.