Case 1404152/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Brooks v Leisure Employment Limited and 3 others — 2021
- Case reference
- 1404152/2020
- Decision date
- 9 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Midgley Appearances
Parties
5 namedKey findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing in Bristol, held in private by telephone on 31 March 2021 before Employment Judge Midgley, the tribunal recorded that the claims against the second, third and fourth respondents were dismissed on the claimant's withdrawal. The written record does not identify the underlying claim type for those respondents and contains no merits findings on those claims.
The claim for unlawful deduction of wages was also dismissed on the claimant's withdrawal. No financial remedy was awarded. The record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the sending of the written record.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Claims against the second, third and fourth respondents were dismissed on the claimant's withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim for unlawful deduction of wages was dismissed on the claimant's withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the .
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.