Case 1404163/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Did not attend For the v Mr Krishnapillai — 2019
- Case reference
- 1404163/2019
- Decision date
- 20 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Midgley Appearances
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Did not attend For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the claimant’s claim for accrued but unpaid annual leave was well founded. It recorded that she was entitled to 58 hours annual leave a year, equivalent to 28 days for a 24-hour working week, and that she had taken 8 hours annual leave in the leave year beginning on 1 March.
On that basis, the tribunal found that the claimant had accrued 18.5 hours of untaken annual leave at the time her contract ended. Using her hourly rate of £8.21, the tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £152.00 in respect of the accrued but untaken annual leave.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the claim for accrued but untaken annual leave was well founded. It calculated 18.5 hours outstanding at termination at an hourly rate of £8.21, resulting in an award of £152.00. | Upheld | — | £152 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £152
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.