Case 1404174/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Connolly v Carlauren Lifestyle Resorts Limited (In administration) — 2020
- Case reference
- 1404174/2019
- Decision date
- 23 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bax Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Connolly
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claim against Carlauren Lifestyle Resorts Limited (in Administration). It found that the respondent company was in administration and that neither the consent of the administrator nor the permission of the court had been obtained for the proceedings to be instituted or continued, as required by the Insolvency Act 1986.
The tribunal had previously given the claimant an opportunity, on 29 June 2020, to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The claimant did not provide any acceptable reason.
On that basis, the tribunal struck out the claim. The judgment does not record any substantive determination of the underlying claim or any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not specify the underlying cause of action; it only records that the claim was struck out because the respondent was in administration and because the claimant did not provide an acceptable reason why the claim should not be struck out for lack of active pursuit. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.