Case 1404176/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Maria Arnold Ms Kerrie Cowley Ms Caitlin Francis Ms Jennifer Hutchings Ms Lisa Watson Ms Emma Wenglorz v Classic Lines (Castle Cary) Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1404176/2022
- Decision date
- 7 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bradford Representation
- Venue
- Remotely
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Maria Arnold Ms Kerrie Cowley Ms Caitlin Francis Ms Jennifer Hutchings Ms Lisa Watson Ms Emma Wenglorz
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe six claimants brought claims after Classic Lines (Castle Cary) Ltd's hairdressing business closed on 9 October 2022. The respondent did not present or respond, and the remedy hearing took place remotely on 7 September 2023. The tribunal relied on the claimants' evidence and the calculations prepared from payslips and found the weekly earnings figures used for the awards were consistent with that evidence.
The tribunal held that the respondent breached the claimants' contracts by dismissing them without notice. It awarded pay in lieu of notice to all six claimants by reference to the statutory notice periods in s.86 Employment Rights Act 1996, and it also ordered compensation for employer pension contributions during the notice period for the four claimants who were enrolled in the pension scheme.
The complaints of unauthorised deductions from wages under Part II Employment Rights Act 1996 were well-founded because the respondent had not paid salary between 3 and 9 October 2022 and had not paid holiday pay on accrued untaken leave. Holiday entitlement was calculated by reference to the 5.6-week entitlement in the Working Time Regulations, pro-rated for each claimant. The tribunal did not make an ACAS uplift because no grievances had been raised.
The tribunal found the dismissals were by reason of redundancy. Those with more than two years' continuous service were awarded redundancy payments under ERA s.136. It said the dismissals would have been made in any event, that a fair procedure was not followed, and that there was no unfair dismissal compensation for ongoing losses. The total ordered was £46,852.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Pay in lieu of notice was awarded to all six claimants after the salon closed without notice; this figure includes the separate pension contribution compensation ordered for the notice period for the four enrolled claimants. | Upheld | — | £13,669 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal treated unpaid salary for 3 to 9 October 2022 and unpaid holiday pay on accrued untaken leave as Part II ERA 1996 unlawful deductions from wages. | Upheld | — | £7,252 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the dismissals were by reason of redundancy and awarded redundancy payments to the claimants with over two years' continuous service under ERA s.136. | Upheld | — | £25,931 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £46,852
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £25,931
- statutory, unfair dismissal
Legal tests applied
5 references- Part II Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.86 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.98 Employment Rights Act 1996
- ERA s.136
- Working Time Regulations 1998 (5.6-week entitlement)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.