Case 1404181/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Ryan & 8 Others v Dhaliwal Restaurants Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1404181/2022
- Decision date
- 12 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gray Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Ryan & 8 Others
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 determination under the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The claim was issued in the Bristol Employment Tribunals on 12 December 2022 and the Respondent failed to present a valid response on time, so the Employment Judge decided that a determination could properly be made on the papers.
The tribunal found that the Respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimants' wages and ordered payment of specified gross sums to each of the nine claimants, ranging from £510.63 to £2,026.78. The award to Megan Mildward (£646.10) is expressly identified in the judgment as relating to holiday pay.
No narrative findings on liability beyond the Rule 21 determination were set out, no legal tests were named, and the hearing previously listed for 16 June 2023 was cancelled. Judgment was given by Employment Judge Gray, dated 13 June 2023 and sent to the parties on 14 June 2023.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment following the Respondent's failure to present a valid response on time. Awards made to eight claimants for unauthorised deductions from wages (gross): Mark Ryan £2,026.78; Asha Al-Khayyat £510.63; Jonas Alenicevas £985.66; Chandon Gallagher £1,031.43; Oscar Arden £1,311.13; Henry Terret £963.20; Sophie Dyke £1,085.72; Lois Giovanna Plummer £987.01. Sum of these eight awards = £8,901.56; figure shown here reflects the per-claim total of the wages-deduction component. | Upheld | — | £8,915 |
| Holiday pay | Award to Megan Mildward of £646.10 expressly marked '(Holiday)' in the judgment, so treated as a holiday pay / working time claim distinct from the wages-deduction awards. | Upheld | — | £646 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,548
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.