Case 1404205/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Fineline Aluminium Design Ltd (In Administration) and The Secretary of State For Business Energy and Industrial Strategy — 2023
- Case reference
- 1404205/2022
- Decision date
- 11 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedKey findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting alone at Bristol on 25 July 2023, held that the first respondent had failed to comply with the requirements of section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. It found the complaint well founded and made a protective award in respect of all employees of the first respondent identified on the attached schedule who were dismissed as redundant on or after 25 November 2022.
The protected period was 90 days beginning on 25 November 2022. The extracted judgment does not set out any separate monetary total in the text provided, and it does not record any separate remedy figures beyond the protective award itself.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal held that the first respondent failed to comply with section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 and made a protective award. No monetary sum was stated in the extracted text. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.