Case 1404207/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Vigh v New Cross Healthcare Solutions Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1404207/2019
- Decision date
- 7 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Reed
- Venue
- Southampton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Vigh
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr A Vigh brought claims against New Cross Healthcare Solutions Ltd for unfair dismissal, breach of contract (or unauthorised deductions from wages), and disability discrimination. The tribunal, sitting alone before Employment Judge Reed at Southampton on 28 January 2020, dealt with the case as a limitation issue and did not record any substantive liability findings on the underlying merits of the dismissal or discrimination allegations.
The tribunal held that the unfair dismissal claim and the breach of contract / unauthorised deductions claim were presented out of time. It found that it was reasonably practicable for those claims to have been presented in time, and on that basis they were dismissed.
The disability discrimination claim was also found to have been presented out of time. The tribunal decided that it was not just and equitable for that claim to proceed, and it was therefore dismissed as well. The judgment records no award of compensation or other monetary remedy and makes no order as to costs.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Presented out of time; the tribunal found it was reasonably practicable for the claim to have been presented in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Described in the judgment as breach of contract (or unauthorised deductions from wages); presented out of time and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Presented out of time; the tribunal held it was not just and equitable for the claim to proceed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- reasonably practicable
- just and equitable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.