Case 1404226/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Massie v Mr M Gay — 2021
- Case reference
- 1404226/2020
- Decision date
- 1 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Massie
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing took place by video on 24 March 2021 before Employment Judge Livesey. The respondent did not attend. The tribunal recorded oral reasons and sent the written judgment on 1 April 2021.
The claimant’s unfair dismissal claim succeeded. The tribunal awarded a basic award of £927.90 and a compensatory award of £2,660.00. It also made a further award of £1,237.20 for failure to provide written particulars under section 38 of the Employment Act.
The claimant’s claim for a redundancy award also succeeded, but the tribunal recorded that he was not entitled to any separate award on that claim. The judgment states that the recoupment provisions apply. The total award recorded by the tribunal was £4,825.10.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held that the unfair dismissal claim succeeded and awarded a basic award of £927.90 and a compensatory award of £2,660.00. | Upheld | — | £3,588 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal said the claim for a redundancy award also succeeded, but the claimant was not entitled to any separate award. | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | The tribunal made an award of £1,237.20 for failure to provide written particulars under section 38 of the Employment Act. | Upheld | — | £1,237 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,825
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £928
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £2,660
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.