Case 1404228/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Nicholas Edwards v Slate and Gray Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1404228/2021
- Decision date
- 4 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge King Representation
- Venue
- Bristol via CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Nicholas Edwards
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNicholas Edwards brought a claim against Slate and Gray Ltd in respect of unpaid wages. The case was heard at Bristol via CVP on 4 March 2022 before Employment Judge King. The respondent was represented by its director, Shaun Johnson, and the claimant appeared in person.
The tribunal held that the claimant's claim in respect of unpaid wages was well founded and succeeded. The written judgment does not give separate factual reasons beyond recording that oral reasons were given at the hearing, and it states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time.
The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £722.00, subject to any tax and employee's National Insurance contributions. No separate split of the award is given in the judgment, and no additional remedy such as interest or injury to feelings is mentioned.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment described the claim as one for unpaid wages and found it well founded. The respondent was ordered to pay £722.00, less any tax and employee's National Insurance contributions. | Upheld | — | £722 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £722
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.