Case 1404229/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K James v Marsham Court Hotel — 2023
- Case reference
- 1404229/2021
- Decision date
- 27 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Roper Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K James
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 4 January 2023, the Tribunal gave Mr K James an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out. The stated reasons were that he had not complied with the Tribunal's order of 4 January 2023 and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
Mr James did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The Employment Judge therefore ordered that the claim be struck out.
The judgment does not identify the substantive claims pleaded, nor does it record any merits findings. It is a procedural disposal only, with the strike out sent to the parties on 27 January 2023.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying claim types; it records only that 'the claim is struck out' after the claimant failed to comply with the Tribunal's order dated 4 January 2023 and did not actively pursue the case. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.