Case 1404232/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss M Leal v Jigger Muddle Shake Pub Group Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1404232/2022
- Decision date
- 12 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Roper Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss M Leal
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which the claimant, Miss M Leal, brought a claim against Jigger Muddle Shake Pub Group Limited in the Bristol Employment Tribunals. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge proceeded to determine the claim on the material before the tribunal.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £3,767.00 gross. The judgment also states that the respondent must pay the claimant £3,767.00 in total, and no separate breakdown of remedy components is given.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment: the respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge determined the claim in the claimant's favour. | Upheld | — | £3,767 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,767
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.