Case 1404239/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Recycling Technologies Ltd (In Administration) and Others — 2024
- Case reference
- 1404239/2022
- Decision date
- 29 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cadney Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that Recycling Technologies Ltd (R1) had failed to comply with section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. It therefore declared the complaint well founded and made a protective award in respect of all employees listed in the attached schedule at Unit B, Stirling Court, Swindon SN3 4TQ who were dismissed as redundant on or after 26 September 2022.
The protected period was 90 days beginning on 26 September 2022. The judgment does not set out a monetary sum in the extracted text, but it records the award by reference to remuneration for that protected period. The claims against the second respondent, R2, were held not well founded and were dismissed.
The judgment also states that the Secretary of State (R3) is liable to meet any unsatisfied award made against R1 in favour of any of the claimants to the extent of its statutory liability.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | The tribunal found that Recycling Technologies Ltd (R1) failed to comply with section 188 of TULRCA and made a protective award for the employees listed in the attached schedule; the protected period was 90 days beginning on 26 September 2022. | Upheld | — | — |
| Trade union | The claims against the second respondent (R2) were held not well founded and were dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.188 TULRCA
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.