Case 1404245/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Lonie v RMD Adventure Learning — 2022
- Case reference
- 1404245/2021
- Decision date
- 7 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dawson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy an order dated 9 November 2022, sent to the parties on 22 November 2022, the Tribunal gave Miss V Lonie an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out. The reasons given were that she had failed to attend the telephone case management preliminary hearing on 9 November 2022 at 2.00 pm and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The extracted reasons do not address the merits of any underlying complaints and do not record any remedy or award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The extracted reasons refer only to 'the claim' and do not separate individual heads; this claim type follows the case listing category supplied in Layer 1. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The extracted reasons refer only to 'the claim' and do not separate individual heads; this claim type follows the case listing category supplied in Layer 1. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.