Case 1404247/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Jenkins v Allen & Stone Ltd t/a Hunters — 2022
- Case reference
- 1404247/2021
- Decision date
- 22 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Leverton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Jenkins
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant was appointed as a lettings manager on a salary of £30,000, signed her contract on 8 September 2021, and was due to start on 6 October 2021. The tribunal found that the first mention of a requirement for her to insure her company vehicle came in a WhatsApp message from Mr Allen on 5 October 2021. The claimant attempted to arrange insurance but encountered high upfront costs, and on the morning of 6 October she did not report for work while continuing to try to obtain a policy.
The tribunal accepted that, after the claimant failed to contact Mr Allen by a deadline he had set through the recruitment agency, Mr Allen withdrew the job offer on 6 October 2021. It found that the claimant had not clearly resigned and that her conduct was too ambiguous to amount to resignation. The withdrawal of the offer therefore amounted to a dismissal, not a resignation or constructive dismissal. However, the tribunal also found that the insurance request did not breach any express or implied term of the contract, including the implied term of trust and confidence.
On notice, the tribunal held that the claimant had less than one month’s service, so she had no statutory entitlement to notice under section 86 ERA 1996. Clause 3 of the contract provided that during the three-month probation period the employer could terminate employment without notice or compensation, as and where permitted by law. Clause 52 was treated as the general notice provision applying outside the probation period. The tribunal concluded that the respondent did not breach the contract by dismissing the claimant without notice pay, and the claim was dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wrongful dismissal | Claim for breach of contract / wrongful dismissal under the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994, seeking notice pay. The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed, but clause 3 of the contract allowed termination during the first month of probation without notice as permitted by law, so there was no contractual or statutory entitlement to notice pay. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
7 references- section 86 ERA 1996
- Skilton v T and K Home Improvements Ltd
- Investors Compensation Scheme Ltd v West Bromwich Building Society (No.1)
- Harrison v George Wimpey and Co Ltd
- Oram v Initial Contract Services Ltd
- London Transport Executive v Clarke
- Zulhayir v JJ Food Service Ltd
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.