Case 1404264/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr I Middlecote v Stewart Golf Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 1404264/2023
- Decision date
- 25 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Volkmer Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr I Middlecote
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe written judgment is a short record of an oral judgment given at Exeter Tribunal on 11 July 2024 before Employment Judge Volkmer. It states that, for the relevant period from 10 May 2021 to 14 April 2023, Mr I Middlecote was a disabled person within the meaning of section 6 Equality Act 2010 because of an acquired brain injury.
The written record does not set out any further findings on liability or remedy. It also notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless a request was made within 14 days of the sending of the written record of the decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The written record states that, at the relevant times (10 May 2021 to 14 April 2023), the claimant was a disabled person as defined by section 6 Equality Act 2010 because of an acquired brain injury. The written judgment does not record any final liability or remedy decision. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 6 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.