Mr Joseph Frost v AND Attu Limited — 2019

Case reference: 1404265/2019
Decision date: 24 December 2019
Jurisdiction: England & Wales

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr Joseph Frost

Respondent

AND Attu Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal dealt with the claim on 24 December 2019 in chambers under rule 21 because the time for presenting a response had expired and no valid response had been presented. Mr Joseph Frost was the claimant and Attu Limited was the respondent.

The tribunal upheld the claimant’s claim for breach of contract in respect of notice pay. It also upheld the claims for unlawful deduction from wages and for accrued but unpaid holiday pay. The judgment records only liability and does not set out a monetary award in this decision.

The tribunal stated that the appropriate remedy would be determined at a later hearing, with notice of that hearing to follow in due course.

Claims and outcomes

3 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Breach of contract	Succeeded in respect of notice pay. The judgment records that the appropriate remedy would be determined at a later hearing.	Upheld	—	—
Unlawful deduction from wages	Succeeded under the rule 21 judgment. No monetary figure was fixed in this judgment.	Upheld	—	—
Holiday pay	Succeeded in respect of accrued but unpaid holiday pay. The judgment did not determine the amount.	Upheld	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.