Case 1404267/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A Thorne v Center Parcs Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 1404267/2023
- Decision date
- 9 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ferguson Representation
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs A Thorne
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs A Thorne brought a disability discrimination claim against Center Parcs Limited. The hearing took place by video at Bristol Employment Tribunal on 24 September 2024 before Employment Judge Ferguson, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by an in-house solicitor.
The Tribunal disposed of the claim by striking it out. The published judgment states that the claim was struck out because the Tribunal had no jurisdiction to consider it and/or because it had no reasonable prospect of success.
The record notes that the reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested. No further findings of fact, liability analysis, or remedy assessment are set out in the published decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The written judgment records only that the claim was struck out because the Tribunal had no jurisdiction to consider it and/or it had no reasonable prospect of success. No written reasons were provided in the published record. | Struck out | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.