Case 1404282/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Van Vliet v Meyer Health Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1404282/2021
- Decision date
- 7 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lang
- Venue
- Southampton
- Panel members
- Mr N Knight, Mr K Sleeth
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Van Vliet
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Southampton Employment Tribunal on 24 July 2023, before Employment Judge Lang sitting with Tribunal Members Mr N Knight and Mr K Sleeth, the parties informed the tribunal that terms of settlement had been agreed in the combined proceedings. The judgment states that the case was adjourned until 4pm on 21 August 2023 to allow those terms to be carried into effect.
The tribunal recorded that if neither party applied to restore the matter to the hearing list by that date and time, the claims would be treated as having been withdrawn on settlement by the claimant and, with the claimant's consent given that day, would stand dismissed without further order. The judgment contains no findings on the merits of the underlying claims and no monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Judgment by consent; no merits finding was made. The tribunal adjourned the proceedings to 4pm on 21 August 2023 to allow settlement terms to be carried into effect, and recorded that if neither party applied to restore the matter by then, the claims would be treated as withdrawn on settlement by the claimant and dismissed without further order. | Settled | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | Judgment by consent; no merits finding was made. The tribunal adjourned the proceedings to 4pm on 21 August 2023 to allow settlement terms to be carried into effect, and recorded that if neither party applied to restore the matter by then, the claims would be treated as withdrawn on settlement by the claimant and dismissed without further order. | Settled | Sex | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Judgment by consent; no merits finding was made. The tribunal adjourned the proceedings to 4pm on 21 August 2023 to allow settlement terms to be carried into effect, and recorded that if neither party applied to restore the matter by then, the claims would be treated as withdrawn on settlement by the claimant and dismissed without further order. | Settled | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.