Case 1404297/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss M Perren v VK Sarvaiya Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1404297/2020
- Decision date
- 11 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge David Hughes
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss M Perren
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the remotely heard hearing on 16 July 2021 before Employment Judge David Hughes, the tribunal determined Miss M Perren's claims against VK Sarvaiya Ltd. It held that her claim for accrued but unpaid holiday pay was well founded and upheld it, ordering the respondent to pay £114.12.
The tribunal also upheld the claimant's claim for unlawful deduction from wages and ordered payment of £295.56. In addition, it found that the respondent had failed to comply with its duty under s38 of the Employment Act 2002 and ordered a further £267.72. The total sum ordered was £677.40.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal held that the claimant's claim for accrued but unpaid holiday pay was well founded and ordered payment of £114.12. | Upheld | — | £114 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that the claimant's claim for unlawful deduction from wages was well founded and ordered payment of £295.56. | Upheld | — | £296 |
| Other | The tribunal found that the respondent failed to comply with its duty under s38 of the Employment Act 2002 and ordered a further payment of £267.72. | Upheld | — | £268 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £677
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.