Case 1404299/2023 · Employment Tribunal
did not attend The v Mr S King, director — 2024
- Case reference
- 1404299/2023
- Decision date
- 18 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Goraj Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
did not attend The
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the respondent had made unlawful deductions from the claimant's wages in the total sum of £992.28, in breach of section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. It ordered the respondent to pay that sum to the claimant.
The claimant's remaining claims for notice / wages and holiday pay were dismissed. The written judgment does not break down the dismissed notice/wages element further, and no separate remedy was awarded on those claims.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unlawful deductions from wages in the total sum of £992.28 in breach of section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | £992 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the claimant's remaining claims for notice / wages were dismissed; the written record does not separate those components further. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the claimant's remaining claim for holiday pay was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £992
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.13 ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.