Case 1404303/2022 · Employment Tribunal
In Person v Mrs Aitken, Director — 2023
- Case reference
- 1404303/2022
- Decision date
- 7 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Smail Appearances
- Venue
- Exeter
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In Person
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Smail heard the case at Exeter by video on 16 October 2023. The claimant, Mr C. Chalmers, appeared in person and the respondent, Bertol Investments Limited, was represented by Mrs Aitken, a director.
The judgment records two monetary awards only. The respondent was ordered to pay notice pay of £1,160 gross and accrued but untaken holiday pay for 7 days of £532 gross. Those sums together made a total award of £1,692 gross.
The text does not set out any further factual findings, legal analysis, or separate reasons beyond the orders made. No discrimination issues, dismissal findings, or additional remedy components are recorded in the extracted judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay notice pay of £1,160 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,160 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay accrued but untaken holiday pay for 7 days in the sum of £532 gross. | Upheld | — | £532 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,692
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.