Case 1404303/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Campbell v Tarka Diner Ltd and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 1404303/2023
- Decision date
- 23 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Frazer
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mrs S Campbell
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Bristol Employment Tribunals on 8 August 2023. The respondents failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge determined that judgment could properly be entered under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The hearing listed for 19 January 2024 was cancelled as a result.
On the merits, the tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from Mrs S Campbell's wages totalling £1,643.03. That sum comprised unpaid wages of £1,023.75, income tax deducted but not accounted for of £233, national insurance deducted but not accounted for of £243.93, and pension deducted but not accounted for of £142.35.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £204.75 for that element. The total amount payable was therefore £1,847.78.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found total unauthorised deductions from wages of £1,643.03, made up of unpaid wages of £1,023.75, income tax deducted but not accounted for of £233, national insurance deducted but not accounted for of £243.93, and pension deducted but not accounted for of £142.35. | Upheld | — | £1,643 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £204.75. | Upheld | — | £205 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,848
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.