Case 1404311/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Laura Carter v AND Careinmyhome Limited and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 1404311/2022
- Decision date
- 30 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Miss Laura Carter
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt with the case under Rule 21 after the time for presenting a response had expired and no valid response had been presented by the first respondent, and the second respondent did not contest the claim. In those circumstances, the tribunal recorded that the claimant’s claim for accrued but unpaid holiday pay against the first respondent succeeded and ordered payment of £450 gross.
The tribunal also recorded that the claimant’s claim for unlawful deduction from wages against the second respondent succeeded and ordered payment of £3,240 gross. The judgment does not set out any broader factual dispute or legal analysis beyond the Rule 21 basis and the two successful monetary claims.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Claim for accrued but unpaid holiday pay against the first respondent succeeded; the tribunal ordered the first respondent to pay £450 gross. | Upheld | — | £450 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for unlawful deduction from wages against the second respondent succeeded; the tribunal ordered the second respondent to pay £3,240 gross. | Upheld | — | £3,240 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,690
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.