Case 1404313/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Lindley v Aztec AVA Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 1404313/2023
- Decision date
- 23 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Leverton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Lindley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Leverton, sitting alone in Bristol (remotely by CVP) over 4-6 September 2024, found the Claimant's complaint of unfair dismissal well-founded. The tribunal held that the Claimant was unfairly dismissed in the context of a redundancy. Because the Claimant had already received a statutory redundancy payment, no basic award was made; instead, the Respondent was ordered to pay a compensatory award of £1,069.36, representing two weeks' net loss of earnings for the additional period that a fair redundancy dismissal procedure would have taken. Recoupment was held not to apply.
The tribunal also found that, when the proceedings began, the Respondent was in breach of its duty to provide the Claimant with a written statement of employment particulars. Applying section 38 of the Employment Act 2002, the tribunal concluded there were no exceptional circumstances making an award unjust or inequitable, but did not consider it just and equitable to award the higher amount of four weeks' gross pay. It therefore ordered the Respondent to pay £1,286, being two weeks' gross pay subject to the statutory cap of £643 per week for 2023/24.
Reasons were given orally at the hearing; written reasons will not be provided unless requested in accordance with the standard procedure. The judgment was sent to the parties on 23 September 2024.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Tribunal found the dismissal unfair on procedural grounds; compensatory award represents two weeks' net loss of earnings for the additional period a fair redundancy dismissal procedure would have taken. No basic award as the Claimant had already received a statutory redundancy payment. Recoupment does not apply. | Upheld | — | £1,069 |
| Other | Failure to provide a written statement of employment particulars. Award made under section 38 Employment Act 2002 of two weeks' gross pay (subject to the statutory cap of £643 per week for 2023/24), totalling £1,286. Tribunal found no exceptional circumstances making such an award unjust or inequitable, but did not consider it just and equitable to award four weeks' gross pay. | Upheld | — | £1,286 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,355
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £1,069
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 38 Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.