Case 1404318/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mrs D Hummerstone, Solicitor — 2021
- Case reference
- 1404318/2020
- Decision date
- 27 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a chambers hearing on 21 April 2021, Employment Judge N J Roper recorded that the claimant's claim of discrimination on the grounds of disability and his claim for entitlement to a statutory redundancy payment were both dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. The judgment does not contain any merits findings on either of those claims.
The judgment also records that these withdrawals did not affect the claimant's remaining claims of direct race discrimination and harassment related to race, which were said to be dealt with in the attached Case Management Summary of the same date. No monetary remedy was awarded in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the claimant's disability discrimination claim was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Redundancy | The judgment states that the claimant's claim for entitlement to a statutory redundancy payment was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.