Case 1404330/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Hollands v Resin Driveways Hub Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1404330/2019
- Decision date
- 14 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rayner
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Hollands
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal did not determine the underlying merits of the claim. It issued a letter dated 13 July 2020 giving Mr K Hollands an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out, because he had not complied with the tribunal's direction dated 1 June 2020 and because the claim had not been actively pursued.
Mr Hollands did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The judgment records the strike out only and does not identify any substantive liability or remedy finding.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37 after a letter dated 13 July 2020 gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing about non-compliance with the tribunal's direction dated 1 June 2020 and the claim not being actively pursued. The claimant did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.