Case 1404332/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Wallace of Counsel For the First v Mrs N Ingle, Solicitor For the Second Respondent: Mr P Chadwick, Consultant — 2020
- Case reference
- 1404332/2019
- Decision date
- 28 May 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Wallace of Counsel For the First
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 28 May 2020, sitting in chambers, Employment Judge N J Roper recorded that the claimant’s claims against the Second Respondent, Arcus Solutions (Holdings) Limited, and for the avoidance of doubt against Arcus Group Limited and Arcus, were dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. The order did not identify the underlying causes of action in this judgment.
The tribunal expressly stated that this dismissal did not affect the claimant’s remaining claims against the First Respondent, which were to continue as explained in the attached Case Management Summary of the same date. No merits determination was made in this order, and no remedy was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The order states that the claimant’s claims against the Second Respondent, Arcus Solutions (Holdings) Limited, and for avoidance of doubt against Arcus Group Limited and Arcus, were dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. The underlying claim types are not specified in this judgment. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.