Case 1404335/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Teixeira v SORecycle Ltd Heard by Cloud video — 2021
- Case reference
- 1404335/2020
- Decision date
- 4 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Reed Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Teixeira
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard by Cloud video on 28 July 2021 before Employment Judge Reed. The claimant, Mr S Teixeira, did not attend. The respondent, SORecycle Ltd, was represented by its managing director, Mr B Murray.
The tribunal's judgment states that, upon the claimant's non-attendance, the claim was dismissed. The written record does not set out substantive findings on the merits of the underlying claims.
The record also notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested by either party within 14 days of the written record being sent.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not separate the heads of claim; it records that the claim was dismissed upon the claimant's non-attendance. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment does not separate the heads of claim; it records that the claim was dismissed upon the claimant's non-attendance. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.