Miss A Mills v Travelodge Hotels Ltd — 2020

Case reference: 1404338/2019
Decision date: 11 March 2020
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Roper Dated

Indexed: 19 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Miss A Mills

Respondent

Travelodge Hotels Ltd

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The Tribunal had written to the claimant on 26 February 2020 giving an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The reasons given were that the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 21 December 2019 and that the claim had not been actively pursued.

The claimant failed to make written representations, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim, and the hearing listed for 15-16 April 2020 was vacated.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	The judgment records that the claim was struck out under rule 37 after the claimant did not comply with a Tribunal order and the claim had not been actively pursued. The supplied listing category identifies the claim as unfair dismissal, but the judgment itself gives no further detail about the underlying complaint.	Struck out	—	—

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.