Case 1404347/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Rodney Harris v Newgate Welding Supplies Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1404347/2020
- Decision date
- 11 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Walters Appearances
- Venue
- Southampton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Rodney Harris
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Rodney Harris brought two claims against Newgate Welding Supplies Limited. The tribunal, sitting at Southampton by CVP before Employment Judge Walters on 7 May 2021, amended the respondent's name by consent to Newgate Welding Supplies Limited.
The tribunal upheld Mr Harris's breach of contract claim for unpaid notice pay and ordered the respondent to pay £104.64. It also upheld his claim for a compensation payment for untaken annual leave under the Working Time Regulations 1998 and ordered payment of £287.01.
No other claims or issues are recorded in the judgment, and no separate statutory or compensatory award structure is set out. The figures awarded on the two claims produce a total of £391.65.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Claim was for notice pay not paid on termination. | Upheld | — | £105 |
| Holiday pay | Claim was for a compensation payment for untaken annual leave under the Working Time Regulations 1998. | Upheld | — | £287 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £392
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.