Case 1404352/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Coster v Mr M Mua — 2024
- Case reference
- 1404352/2023
- Decision date
- 24 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey Claimant
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Coster
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs S Coster’s case was heard at Bristol by video on 12 January 2024 before Employment Judge Livesey. The written record notes that, by consent, the respondent’s name was amended to N-Virocycle Ltd. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Mrs Ralph of Croner.
The tribunal dismissed the claimant’s claim of unlawful deductions from wages. It also dismissed the claim recorded in the judgment as unpaid notice pay, which corresponds to the breach of contract issue in the case listing. The decision record does not set out detailed reasons because the reasons were given orally at the hearing.
No monetary award was made. The written judgment is limited to the dismissal of the two claims and the administrative amendment of the respondent’s name.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment refers to this claim as unpaid notice pay; it does not use a separate legal label in the text. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.