Case 1404362/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss R Felton v Meadow Farm Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1404362/2020
- Decision date
- 23 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge O’Rourke Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss R Felton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the Bristol video hearing on 12 August 2021 before Employment Judge C H O'Rourke, Miss Felton's claims of unfair dismissal, failure to pay a redundancy payment, unlawful deduction from wages, failure to pay arrears of holiday pay as claimed, and failure to provide terms and conditions of employment were dismissed.
The tribunal found a separate breach of contract in relation to notice and ordered Meadow Farm Limited to pay one month’s pay in lieu of notice, agreed at £2,083.33. It also recorded that the respondent had conceded arrears of accrued holiday pay and ordered payment of £83.87, producing a total monetary award of £2,167.20.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment dismissed the claim as pleaded; it also separately recorded a holiday pay concession and award of £83.87. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Failure to provide terms and conditions of employment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Breach in respect of notice; one month’s pay in lieu of notice was agreed at £2,083.33. | Upheld | — | £2,083 |
| Holiday pay | Respondent conceded arrears of accrued holiday pay; the judgment separately states that the holiday-pay claim as claimed was dismissed. | Upheld | — | £84 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,167
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.